‘Dr.’ Omeish, the Islamofascist who was recently forced into resignation by Republican delegates in Virginia, was given a platform by the Washington Post to blame America’s and Virginia’s ‘intolerance’ for his persecution.
“[Americans] are still willing to stifle dissent while we claim that we want to achieve tolerance and inclusion.”
Well, not quite.
No one stifled Omeish’s anti-America/anti-Israel speach in 2006.
The fact is that Omeish was fired because his numerous connections to Islamo-Fascists, and that is not tolerated in Virginia.
(H/T – LGF)
37 Comments
Why do you put the word “Dr.” in quotation marks? HealthGrades vouches for the legitimacy of his degree: http://tinyurl.com/3xwkqx.
As for the Washington post, should they only publish letters to the editor they agree with?
As for the Washington post, should they only publish letters to the editor they agree with?
They shouldn’t give a terrorist supporter to lie about the reasons that he was forced to resign. No one is trying to stifle his voice, but he has to accept the fact that the U.S. does not want militant Islamics or their supporters in any kind of position of power (see the videos linked above). Also, remember, this guy is the president of the Muslim American Society… you know, the “We are all supporters of Hamas and Hezbollah!” MAS, which was created by the Muslim Brotherhood (a radical Islamist group).
As for the quotes, they’re intended to capture the tone of my voice as if I were explaining this to someone in person.
“As for the quotes, they’re intended to capture the tone of my voice as if I were explaining this to someone in person.”
I realize that. Scare quotes are used to indicate skepticism.
Regarding the Muslim Brotherhood, it’s actually a fairly moderate organization, since most of the radicals split off to form their own groups (see my brief history of Salafism: http://tinyurl.com/326ec5).
I wouldn’t call the Brotherhood a fairly moderate organization. I would call them a faily moderate Islamofascist organization that supports the destruction of Democratic societies.
“faily moderate Islamofascist organization”
That’s what I mean. They are extremely Right Wing (remember, this means something different in the Islamic world than in the West), but they want to impose Sharia law by working within Egypt’s existing system. They disavow the use of violence, which is why little groups of them keep breaking away and forming terrorist associations.
We don’t want the Muslim brotherhood in America
It’s so cute that you’re denouncing “Islamo-Fascism” in one sentence, and then advocate throwing a professor in jail for stating opinions that you deem “bad for society.”
Who’s the REAL fascist here, Mr. P?
Bigot.
Toasterhead:
Omeish, he’s not just a fascist, he’s an Islamo-Fascist. Very familiar, I might add, with taqiyya. (I bet it eats you up inside when kuffar discover the dark side of the ‘Religion of Peace’!)
Thank you! Coming from someone who said that the U.S. deserved 9/11, I take that as a compliment!
p.s.
YOU MAKE ME SICK!!!
I have repeatedly invited you to prove me wrong, and thus far you have failed to do so. I can only assume, then, that you agree with me.
Salaam!
I’ll issue the first response.
traitorhead Says:
“I have repeatedly invited you to prove me wrong, and thus far you have failed to do so. I can only assume, then, that you agree with me.
Salaam!”
Your mouth is writing quite the check there, using twisted logic and all, toasterhead. I believe I made clear a while back that claiming “the U.S. deserved 9/11″ is a fallacy that cancels itself out.
Even with that, I’m sure Mr. P issued you PLENTY of responses on the TP board concerning your despicable claims, toastedhead. Refer to them. On the other hand, you have yet to cite any nationally acclaimed expert proving your slanderous assertion.
You can choose to stop pretending your drivel goes without saying; otherwise I’ll have your America-slandering comments deleted.
And this is part of what makes you an un-American S.O.B. Ya’ see, here in America people are presumed innocent until proven guilty! The fact that you would expect someone to prove that the victims of Islamofascist terrorists didn’t deserve to die, makes you terrorist sympathizer and, in my book, a big time piece of shit.
Fuck you, traitorhead!
CT,
You’re right, there is no need to argue with this ignoramus. However, it’s best to let his comment stand so that people can see him for what he is.
But I won’t allow him to keep posting if he’s going to keep spewing that garbage.
The fact that you would expect someone to prove that the victims of Islamofascist terrorists didn’t deserve to die, makes you terrorist sympathizer and, in my book, a big time piece of shit.
I didn’t say that the victims of “Islamofascist” terrorists deserved to die. First of all, there is no such thing as an Islamofascist. Second, I said that America deserved to be attacked. Not the individual victims who died in the 9/11 attacks, but the country as a whole. The term is blowback, and U.S. foreign policy since 1953 has generated a shitload of it. I’ve posted long explanations of my position before, both on TP and on my blog, and explained in detail why it doesn’t make me a terrorist sympathizer. In fact, it makes me a patriot.
No. It makes you a piece of shit dhimmi and a terrorist sympathizer. I don’t have time to deal with your bull shit right now so don’t even think about trying to defend al-Qaida attacks on this blog.
Actually, that goes without saying at all times.
I have never defended al-Qa’ida attacks and don’t plan to start any time soon. But I’m glad to see that your commitment to freedom is so strong that you’re planning to censor me on your blog if I don’t change my views.
I have never defended al-Qa’ida attacks and don’t plan to start any time soon.
Okay, I’m through with you. Don’t even try to say that al-Qaida and OBL weren’t responsible for ‘giving the U.S. what they deserved.’ You twooofers make me sick.
“Second, I said that America deserved to be attacked. Not the individual victims who died in the 9/11 attacks, but the country as a whole.”
News flash: The country is made up of individual people. There is no discrete “America” sitting in an armored vault beneath the Capitol building that you can attack.
Mr. P,
Don’t delete him just yet. I want to have a chance at him.
Memo to Traitorhead: I’m still awaiting your citation of an acclaimed expert confirming that “the U.S. deserved 9/11.”
Sergei, I’ll hope for Toasterhead’s return, and I may even leave a memo for him on Thinkprogress should he forget or refuse to show. As you’re apparently a non-partisan poster here (correct me if I’m wrong), I look forward to this debate.
Okay, fellas, as long as this doesn’t turn into a Trutheresque debate. If he comes back with unsubstantiated claims, I’ll be forced to delete.
Search engines direct a variety of people here from all over the political spectrum. I don’t want truthers to think that this is a forum for them to spew their hair-brain theories… unless it’s ace (aka plunger), then it’s comedy gold!
Sup Dean CT!
I don’t have any citations from acclaimed experts confirming my opinion. So sorry to disappoint you, but acclaimed experts don’t like to “go there.”
However, information on involvement by the U.S. corporatocracy in the Middle East that I believe led to the blowback we received on September 11, 2001 is detailed in John Perkins’ Confessions of an Economic Hit Man and The Secret History of the American Empire, Michael Scheuer’s Imperial Hubris, Paul Farmer’s Pathologies of Power, Steven Hiatt’s A Game As Old As Empire, Edward Said’s Orientalism, and other sources. This is where I base my opinion.
If this is insufficient to satisfy your needs, I’m sorry.
Confessions of an Economic Hit ManTwoofer!The Secret History of the American EmpireTwoofer!Imperial HubrisAl Qaida apologist! Defeatist!Pathologies of PowerChomskyesque!A Game As Old As EmpireTwoofer!OrientalismChomskyite!(by the way, that last book was written in 1978… nice try)
Well, your infantile catchphrases have bested me on the Internet. I guess I’ll have to change my opinion, then. I guess you’re right – the Islamofascist sand [edited, don't use that word here! - Mr. P] hate us for our freedom after all.
Toodles!
Traitorhead flashback:
“We are the people of toleration. It’s the only reason we haven’t exterminated you morons on the right.” – Comment by toasterhead, October 12th, 2007.
Your reason probably isn’t so much “toleration” as it is a desire to avoid multiple life prison sentences for domestic acts of terror.
May want to re-read the instructions on how to use that kitchen appliance you keep for a brain. Probably, you forgot to plug it in, or you have a fork jammed in it.
toasterhead Says:
“If this is insufficient to satisfy your needs, I’m sorry.”
It’s not a “need” traitorhead, it’s a requirement. You’re right — experts wouldn’t want to “go there,” but it’s because there’s insufficient treading due to a lack of facts. So congrats, traitorhead, you remain at square one with your unproven anti-American theories!
How, exactly, can one be a “patriot” (as per your self-proclamation) of the same country they claim “deserved” 9/11, or any attack for that matter?
Great points CT, however I have a feeling that Mr. Toast will avoid giving an answer, then he will appear on a thread weeks from now pretending that the exchange never took place
It’s not a “need” traitorhead, it’s a requirement. You’re right — experts wouldn’t want to “go there,” but it’s because there’s insufficient treading due to a lack of facts. So congrats, traitorhead, you remain at square one with your unproven anti-American theories!
There’s no point trying to prove my opinion to you – you’ll just claim that my facts are “twoofer propaganda.” I’ve posted several times on TP and on my blog about the long chain of historical events, including Operation Ajax in 1953, the 1963 coup and show trial of Iraqi PM Abd al-Karim Qasim, the 1974 U.S./Saudi Joint Economic Commission, the arming and later abandonment of the Afghan Mujaheddin in Operation Cyclone, the arming of both sides in the Iran-Iraq War, and the ignoring of fatwas and evidence of impending attack, that led up to the 9/11/01 attacks.
When I look at all of these events objectively – and this is just a small sampling, it appears that we set up all the dominoes and then were surprised when someone knocked them down. And it certainly doesn’t look to me like we were just an innocent victim who did nothing wrong and got attacked for no reason If you keep teasing a dog long enough, eventually you’re going to get bit. I say that you deserve to get bit.
t’s not that hard a logical leap, is it?
How, exactly, can one be a “patriot” (as per your self-proclamation) of the same country they claim “deserved” 9/11, or any attack for that matter?
“My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.”
- Senator Carl Shurz, 1872
Criticizing one’s country, even as harshly as I have, is not a right but a duty in a democracy. I know my country can do better than this, and I will keep criticizing until it does.
Why should have to wipe their asses?
“the long chain of historical events… that led up to the 9/11/01 attacks.”
Sorry, not quite. That “long chain of historical events” does explain why we are so hated in the Middle East, as well as (among others) the hostage crisis, the ‘83 Beirut barracks bombing, the Khobar Towers bombing, etc., but not 9/11. Al-Qaeda attacked — and continues to attack — us because we support the existing regimes in the Near East. We prevent them from destroying these regimes, which they want to do so that they can set up a false Caliphate in their place. It might be nice to think that they hate us for our freedoms, or that they hate us for our sins, but in reality we are not the center of their world. They have objectives of their own.
Al-Qaeda attacked — and continues to attack — us because we support the existing regimes in the Near East. We prevent them from destroying these regimes, which they want to do so that they can set up a false Caliphate in their place.
I agree with your first sentence – it’s just one item on a long list of their grievances, real and imagined.
I’m more dubious about the whole Khaliphate thing. Admittedly, I need to do more research on it, but I think it’s a highly overblown threat. Sure, UBL and al-Qa’ida might want it, with – surpise – Usama himself calling dibs as the leader, but it’s just not realistic. It’s tough enough for individual Palestinian tribes to agree on anything, and they share a common culure and dialect. If al-Qa’ida thinks that they can suddenly erase centuries of inter-Muslim ethnic clashes between Persian and Arab, Pashtun and Persian, Arab and Imazighen, erase all borders, and unite all the varying factions of Islam – Sunni and Sufi and Shi’a, Wahhabi and Malian near-Animist – under strict Sunni law they’re seriously delusional.
toast,
STFU! You claim that the attacks on 9/11 were justified, we don’t give a shit about what you think about Muslims! Since you didn’t address the real point of Sergei’s statement, I’ll have to assume that you don’t have an argument and that you are full of it.
What point did I miss? That we’re not the center of al-Qa’ida’s universe? I agree with him – we’re not. But while the Khaliphate may be one of their pipe dreams, I don’t believe it’s one of their objectives.
And I don’t care what you think about my opinions. I’ll state them anyway.
You missed this point:
Which directly refers to your claim:
“But while the Khaliphate may be one of their pipe dreams, I don’t believe it’s one of their objectives.”
“If our intended goal in this age is the establishment of a caliphate in the manner of the Prophet and if we expect to establish its state predominantly-according to how it appears to us-in the heart of the Islamic world, then your efforts and sacrifices-God permitting-are a large step directly towards that goal.”
—Ayman al-Zawahri, in a 2005 letter to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
I have done a good deal of research on this matter.
I stand corrected.
Happy now?
I’m not. You still have no qualms says that the U.S. deserved the 9/11 attacks.
Ok, then. Can’t please everyone. By the way – I’ve just renamed my blog “Toasterhead’s Jihadosphere.” Thanks for the suggestion!
disgraceful…
One Trackback/Pingback
[...] is a comment which Toasterhead has left on a public blog for all to see: October 23, 2007 at 9:53 am Thank you! Coming from someone who said that the U.S. deserved 9/11, I take that as a [...]