VITAM IMPENDERE VERO, IVVENALIS

Muslim Pedophiles Seek Preferential Treatment on Grounds of Faith

MK at The Midnight Sun recently posted about a Muslim man who was let off the hook for driving 64mph in a 30mph area. This is “fast enough to qualify for instant disqualification.” The offender, Mohammad Anwar, did not lose his licence to drive, though. Why? Well, because not having a licence would

make it difficult [for him] to commute between his two wives and fulfil his matrimonial duties… the Muslim restaurant owner has one wife in Motherwell and another in Glasgow – he is allowed up to four under his religion – and sleeps with them on alternate nights.

This seems like a piss poor excuse to me, but it doesn’t get my blood boiling like the following case of special treatment for those who belong to the sensitive faith of Islam:

Muslim sex offenders could opt out of treatment programme ‘because it’s against their faith’

Muslim sex offenders are asking to be let off a prison treatment programme on religious grounds.

Rapists, paedophiles and other dangerous attackers are expected to discuss their crimes with other inmates as a condition of release.

But Muslim prisoners complain that criminals should not have to talk about their offences – a “legitimate Islamic position”, according to Ahtsham Ali, the Prison Service’s Muslim adviser.

One thousand inmates were put on the Sex Offender Treatment Programme last year with places usually reserved for the most dangerous attackers.

Failure to complete the course can weigh against an offender at parole hearings.

The possibility of an exemption for Muslims came to light in a letter from an unnamed inmate to Inside Time, a newspaper for prisoners.

The convict said: “I have always insisted that it was against Islamic teachings to discuss your offence to anyone, let alone act it out within a peer group.”

Experts said ministers, who have launched a review of the issue, could face a legal challenge from Muslims kept longer in prison because they had not undergone the treatment programme.

Harry Fletcher, of the probation union Napo, said: “If they do not take part, Muslim sex offenders are likely to serve longer sentences, possibly the whole of their term, before they are released.”

I don’t give an Allah damn who you are or what religion you claim, if you are a pedophile, rapist, child molester or some other scumbag, the officers at the correctional facility in which you find yourself had better be able to see progress in your condition.

Also, notice how they are appealing to Islam? Where was the religious ferver when the crimes were being committed?

13 responses

  1. melo

    Failure to complete the course can weigh against an offender at parole hearings.

    Sounds good. If they don’t want to take the course, let it weigh against them.

    April 8, 2008 at 9:34 pm

  2. melo

    Harry Fletcher, of the probation union Napo, said: “If they do not take part, Muslim sex offenders are likely to serve longer sentences, possibly the whole of their term, before they are released.”

    Gee… sure would be a shame for a sex offender to have to serve the whole of their term. /sarc

    April 8, 2008 at 9:39 pm

  3. “legitimate Islamic position”, according to Ahtsham Ali

    I can’t believe a Muslim actually defending these rapists, pedophiles, and criminals on Islamic principles.

    April 8, 2008 at 10:41 pm

  4. melo

    Why can’t you believe it? Some Muslims defend wife-beating and terrorism on “Islamic principles.”

    April 8, 2008 at 11:25 pm

  5. Why can’t you believe it? Some Muslims defend wife-beating and terrorism on “Islamic principles.”

    Because it doesn’t make sense. Muslims are being criticized left and right, this isn’t going to help.

    April 9, 2008 at 4:35 am

  6. Yogi Barrister

    Don’t Republican pedophiles do exactly the same thing? Out of the 272 Republican felons, 60 of them are pedophiles. Not to worry, Jesus has forgiven them.

    April 9, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    • Rue Angel

      Of course, sex offenders can come from any religion,..But we should note, that when a “Christian” commits a sex crime, then, “Christians”, will condim, the offender, & the criminal act,it self,.& the offender, certainly, cannot find “justification” for the crime, in the teachings, of “Christianity, or in personale, example of “Christ”, himself,..But, when a Moslim, commits a sex crime, of any sort,..he will point to the example of “The Profit”,..& teachings of “Islam”, as “justification” for any crime,..no matter how vile or degenerate,..Indeed, Muslims, can find justification, for ANY act of BARBARISM, in the examples set by that SADISTIC SYCO,WARLORD, that they call the “PROFIT”, & in that contagious “mental illness”, called “ISLAM”. It is past time, for “Western Man” to “grow a pair”, & begin to expel the “carriers”, of this “mental illness”, called “ISLAM”, from the “civilized” nations that they are increasingly contaminating, with their vile excuse for a religion,..

      May 15, 2009 at 11:53 pm

  7. From your article: “The convict said: “I have always insisted that it was against Islamic teachings to discuss your offence to anyone, let alone act it out within a peer group.”

    I wrote a while back on Zina and think this may give some background in regards to what they are basing this on:

    “24.19 Those who love (to see) scandal published broadcast among the Believers, will have a grievous Penalty in this life and in the Hereafter: Allah knows, and ye know not.

    The combination of the strict requirements for proving zina, the preference for repentence and keeping the matter unpublicized make the matter of zina as one of preserving societal norms which include set values and morals. Let me refer back to verse 24.19 (above) as well as to hadith (from wiki):

    Reported by many companions that Ma’iz went before Muhammad in the Mosque and said, “I have committed adultery, please purify me.” (In another report, Muhammad asked Ma’iz that the reports he heard about him are correct or not[7]) Muhammad turned his face away from him and said “Woe to you, go back and pray to Allah for forgiveness.” But the boy again came in front of Muhammad and repeated his desire for purification. The act was repeated three times, until Abu Bakr, sitting close by, told the Ma’iz to leave, as the fourth repetition of the plea would get him stoned. But the man persisted. Muhammad then turned to him and said “you might have kissed or caressed her or you might have looked at her with lust (and so assumed that you committed Zina)”. Ma’iz replied in the negative. Allah’s Apostle said “did you lie in bed with her?” Ma’iz replied in the affirmative. He then asked, “did you have sexual intercourse?” Ma’iz replied in the affirmative. Then Muhammad got quite uncomfortable, and asked “Did your male organ disappear in the female part?” Ma’iz replied in the affirmative. He then asked, once more, whether Ma’iz knew what Zina means. Ma’iz replied “yes, I have committed the same act a husband commits with his wife.” Muhammad asked if he was married, and he replied “yes”. Muhammad asked if he took any wine, and Ma’iz again replied in the negative. Muhammad then sent for an inquiry from the neighbors of Ma’iz, whether or not Ma’iz suffered from insanity. The replies all came in the negative. Muhammad then said, “had you kept it a secret, it would have been better for you.” Muhammad then ordered Ma’iz to be stoned to death. During the stoning, Ma’iz cried out, “O people, take me back to the Holy Prophet, the people of my clan deluded me.” When this was reported to Muhammad, he replied “Why did you not let him off, he might have repented, and Allah may have accepted it.””

    I’m not quite sure that this would apply to this situation though as it is intended more for protecting women from being falsely accused of adultery. For the purposes of rehabilitation – I’m not sure these examples apply in the same way.

    However, I think the bigger question is – if discussing the crime – if they have to reenact the crime and/or describe them (as was stated in the complaint) to other inmates are actually proven methods of rehabilitation. If that part of the program is proven to aide in turning sex offenders away from such acts, I’d like to see the studies. I can imagine that while it may help some be rehabilitated that it could be actually arousing to others. I thought I’ve run accross some research in regards to this – I’ll have to do some searching.

    April 10, 2008 at 4:25 pm

  8. I can imagine that while it may help some be rehabilitated that it could be actually arousing to others.

    I am sure that others do find it arousing, which, imho, is all the more reason to find out who is aroused so that they can work out these problems while in jail.

    I wouldn’t want a sex offender to repress his or her feelings while incarcerated, only to be released and lose control.

    April 10, 2008 at 8:44 pm

  9. John Cunningham

    Yogi Barrister, I don’t understand your point. Regardless of party affiliation no one here excuses their behavior and they lock up Republicans just like anyone else. Do I detect a poor attempt at a cheap shot?

    April 11, 2008 at 9:02 am

  10. Pingback: Egyptian Author Speaks About Muslim Sex Offenders and Oppression of Women « Dj Konservo

  11. Nordicelt

    In reading the comments, above, of both Muslims, & of their “Politically Correct” appologists, it seems to me that, “they”, are overlooking, one, very important, basic point,..which is,..When a “Muslim”, voluntarily, immigrates to a “NON MUSLIM”, country, he must be prepared accept the primise, that he is NOW, bound by the LAWS, CUSTOMES, & MORES, of his adoped country, & that he is NOT, now free to RAPE, the women of his adopted country just because, they are not dressed according to “Muslim” standards,.& that they cannot SODOMIZE, babies as young as 3,..under any circumstances,..Nor are they allowed to MURDER, their own daughters, in that “God Forsaken” ritual that they call,.. “Honor Killing”,..It seems to me, that, by in large, Muslim immigrants to “Non Muslim”, countries are intent in bringing their “BARBARIC”, customes with them, into the more “civilized”, parts of the world,..I would be in favoure, of declaring “ALL”, Muslims, to be “Unfit”, to be allowed residence, in any, “NON Muslim”, county,..& EXPELLED, FORTHWITH, THEREFROM”, & then DEPORTED back to those, God Forsaken , neither ,regions, from which they came,..& they can take their vile, so called, “Religion”, & dispicable customes with them, when they go,..& don’t let the door hit them on their way out,..

    May 16, 2009 at 12:58 am

  12. Peter Albrighton

    Pakistani youths are taught by their older peers on how to seduce underage teenage girls of other religions (christian, hindu, sikh) in order to convert them to Islam, they are taught that they will be given a guaranteed place in heaven for doing so.

    It overrides all other moral arguments in their heads, most people would be stopped by their conscience but if you believe the almighty wants it then there are no barriers.

    Their older peers even facilitate their activities, for example their father will lend them his BMW/merc in order to give them more chance of success.

    July 9, 2011 at 1:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.