Dj Konservo

Icon

VITAM IMPENDERE VERO, IVVENALIS

Spencer Speaks About Islam | UPDATED: More Explication of Fitna

Many Muslims don’t like Robert Spencer.

I can’t imagine why? There is nothing that he says in this clip that is not factual.

from avideditor.wordpressposted with vodpod

If anyone disagrees with the assertion I made above, I request that he or she kindly point out Spencer’s mistake.

I won’t hold my breath.

(BTW, I don’t see any reason why Muslims around the world can’t act reasonably when faced with perceived insults. In fact, I know that most Muslims are reasonable, and that these voices of reason are not heard (at least not heard by me) as often as would be desired. I found this post enlightening and encouraging.)

UPDATE:

I should say, however, that in the link I provide above I am somewhat saddened that more of the commenters on that blog did not view Fitna before deciding that Wilders was an extremist stirring up hatred.

There was no extra inflammatory propositions in Fitna, no new special criticisms. Actually, the criticisms found in Fitna can also be found being made by Muslims who wish to do away with absurdities such as talking trees that call Muslims to slaughter Jews and the like.

But [sigh] for those who still refuse to watch Fitna and would like more explication than was offered in the clip above, here is Robert Spencer’s latest installment of Jihad Watch:

HotAir.com – New Jihad Watch:A fitna over Fitna

(H/T – Connie)

Filed under: Antisemitism, Politics, Religion/Ideology, Terrorism, War , , , , , , , , , , , ,

29 Responses

  1. konservo says:

    Cool, thanks, Connie :D

  2. trajan75 says:

    I wonder what the Think Progress crowd would think about thid video.

  3. konservo says:

    Trajan,

    It’s nothing but Neo-Con Islamophobia incarnate.

  4. “If anyone disagrees with the assertion I made above”

    You did not make an assertion. You merely posted a series of letters, each of which also appears in the sentence “I love Islam, why don’t Nick Griffin and the BNP?” Any additional meaning a person might see originates with that person.

    It is true that most (though not all) of the facts Spencer cites are correct. It is also true that he leaves his conclusion unspoken. Unspoken, however, does not mean unmade. What upsets Muslims is his implicit assertion that the Medieval interpretation of Islam is the correct one; that Islam itself is inherently bad.

    It is true that he, somewhat unusually, draws a distinction between radical and moderate Islam. It is also clear that, in regards to which one is correct, he sides with the radicals. This is evidenced by, among other things, his implicit assertion in the opening quotations that the word “infidel” refers to all non-Muslims, when in fact there are those who would argue that the term, in this context, referred specifically to the pagan Arab tribe, an interpretation that is reinforced by Muhammad’s relations with non-Muslim Ethiopia. I realize that he does not claim this specifically, in the realms of semantics and grammar, but he does claim it in what linguists refer to as pragmatics, a field that does not need to be explained in depth; just let your wetware do the work.

    It is also evidenced by his choice of sources. Tenth century jurists obviously have tenth century viewpoints. Here’s a sampling of what our cultural forebears were up to back then:

    “If any one violate Christianity, or reverence heathenism, by word or by work, let him pay as well wer [money], as wite [more money] or lah-slit [Danish money], according as the deed may be.”

    “If any one withhold tithes, let him pay lah-slit among the Danes, wite among the English. If any one withhold Rom-feoh [Peter's Pence], let him pay lah-slit among the Danes, wite among the English. ”

    The Laws of Alfred, Guthrum, and Edward the Elder

    Imagine, a jizya on believers and unbelievers alike.

    He also fails to mention the dissenting voices mentioned earlier.

  5. konservo says:

    You did not make an assertion. You merely posted a series of letters, each of which also appears in the sentence “I love Islam, why don’t Nick Griffin and the BNP?” Any additional meaning a person might see originates with that person.

    Okay, then, by your logic, when you type “You did not make an assertion,” I will take you to mean “I agree.”

  6. konservo says:

    that Islam itself is inherently bad.

    That conclusion is not spoken or made. Have you seen Fitna?

  7. “Okay, then, by your logic, when you type ‘You did not make an assertion,’ I will take you to mean ‘I agree.’”

    I was making an analogy. Just as the individual letters are essentially meaningless, so too are the individual facts; what’s important in the interpretation.

    “That conclusion is not spoken or made.”

    As I said, “I realize that he does not claim this specifically, in the realms of semantics and grammar, but he does claim it in what linguists refer to as pragmatics, a field that does not need to be explained in depth; just let your wetware do the work.”

    “Have you seen Fitna?”

    What does Spencer have to do with Fitna?

  8. konservo says:

    What does Spencer have to do with Fitna?

    I thought you were referring to the clips above in which he speaks of Fitna. If you were talking about Spencer’s general take on Islam, he specifically states that it is not inherently evil, but rather there are interpretations of the texts which are used to justify violence, murder, and suicide attacks. He thinks that there needs to be a discussion of how these texts are being interpretated and how ideas such as hatred, Islamic supremacism, anti-Semiticism and violence toward non-Muslims are passed along to future generations.

    Not addressing these issues is negligent.

  9. John Cunningham says:

    Extremists make up ten percent. That’s 900,000,000 to 100,000,000. The extremists are outnumbered 9 to 1. How come they can’t get that under control all by themselves?

  10. konservo says:

    John,

    I think it’s because a majority Muslims across the world refuse to address the issues. They’d sooner criticize Bush than Mashaal, they’d sooner slam the Republican party than HAMAS, they’d sooner bitch about ‘Western’ “Islamophobia” than propaganda and real hate speech such as that found in Iranian, Saudi (and let’s say just about every Persian/Arabian Gulf nation), Palestinian, Egyptian, Syrian, Lebanese, Turkish, etc. etc. schools, mosques and airwaves.

  11. John Cunningham says:

    Konservo, but, you forgot, there’s you and I simply because we’re alive.

  12. konservo says:

    John,

    The extremists, to be sure, do hold us to blame in one way or another for their troubles (whether it be because the U.S. had the audacity to give aid to Kuwait and the KSA when Saddam was tearing shit up, or because our Zionist leaders are the Great Satan, etc. etc.). But, it is important to recognize and encourage the efforts of Muslims who speak against extremism.

    The post I cite above, for example, recommends that Muslims simply not watch the film and there is very little slamming of Wilders. I think that is a reasonible approach, and then, just today, I saw a comment on that thread:

    April 12, 2008 at 10:02 am
    Boycotting the film will do nothing for those who have suffered at the hands of terrorists, nor those who fear exactly what this film tells us to fear. There is nothing new in this film; it is but a condensed version of its subject.

    Answering hate with love does mean putting our heads in the sand until it all blows over. Citing Biblical passages equivalent to the Qur’anic ayahs in this film does not cancel out anything.

    We are left with continued hatred against Muslims for what has happened and what may happen again. Who shall we really blame for this film? The film maker? I daresay not.

    The events in this film were not perpetrated by Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, or atheists. Broken Mystic has given us the hard answer; we Muslims must face this situation and address its root causes while taking concrete steps to right whatever wrongs resulted in this depraved state of affairs in the first place.

    That said, I hasten to admit that I do not know the Sufi path; perhaps passive resistence is, indeed, the appropriate response for those who set themselves upon that Path.

    The reactions and comments on any given topic will be diverse for any large group of people (e.g. a religious group), and the reactions from various Muslims have ranged from the comment I just quoted, to angry mobs burning flags and threating lives in the Middle East.

    It is more urgent to expose the extremists, but in order to do Justice to Islam, we have to note the reasonable Muslims who speak out.

    It’s the overwhelming silence that bothers me, the voices of reason from within the Islamic faith have to over-power the extremist voices and the deafening silence of the complicit herd following their masters, or waiting for one side to pull ahead of the other.

  13. vermontdave says:

    Mr P,
    Sergei raised some valid points.
    peace

  14. trajan75 says:

    Spencer knows alot about Islam. He speaks the truth.

  15. konservo says:

    vermontdave,

    I like Sergei, but he was off point last night. Sergei says:

    Just as the individual letters are essentially meaningless, so too are the individual facts; what’s important in the interpretation.

    His analogy assumes that I was working with a theory of atomism in which the meaning of a proposition is found in its constituent words and the meaning of words in letters. This is inaccurate.

    Further, let’s look at that again:

    Just as the individual letters are essentially meaningless, so too are the individual facts; what’s important in the interpretation.

    Is he saying that “what’s” (i.e. the thing that is) “important in the interpretation” is “essentially meaningless” ?

    Or perhaps he is trying to ask me a question “What is important in the interpretation,” it’s unclear.

  16. “It’s the overwhelming silence that bothers me”

    Violence tends to get people’s attention more than condemnation.

    “His analogy assumes that I was working with a theory of atomism in which the meaning of a proposition is found in its constituent words and the meaning of words in letters. This is inaccurate.”

    It can be hard to translate things from linguistics to philosophy. What I was trying to say was that addressing the facts that he adduces rather than his overall point is like addressing the letters of a sentence rather than its meaning. Cf. “Lies, damn lies, and statistics.”

    “important in the interpretation”

    Oops. “In” should be “is”.

  17. konservo says:

    Oops. “In” should be “is”.

    Oh, well, that makes a lot more sense :P

    Spencer doesn’t pretend to be explicating the views of moderates and he is not trying to give definitive interpretations of Islamic text. He’s merely showing how ridiculous it is that the issue can not even be raised without accusations of ‘hate speech’ and ‘Islamophobia.’

    This is dangerous for two reasons (and Spencer doesn’t say this, I am):

    1) If these issues are not addressed with words, if the ignorant are not informed, if the questions which give rise to fears are not answered, the Islamophobia will only increase.

    2) He does not lie, he does not call for violence, he merely cites the Qur’anic justification used by Islamic terrorists (terrorists who are motivated by an interpretation of Islam), and when people call for the truth to be censored, this should raise a red flag.

    Yet, far too many see Robert Spencer as a bigger problem than the murderers and terrorists whom he speaks out against.

  18. John Cunningham says:

    I agree with the theory but the silence and little conversation gives the impression there is general agreement. Maybe a little less silence and conversing and a little more doing is in order. Otherwise, what are we to think? Actions speak louder than words. People are liable to think they’re “saying” by the silence, ‘they may be terrorists, but they’re our terrorists’.

  19. avideditor says:

    Fitna is tame. watch Islam what the west needs to know. http://avideditor.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/islam-what-the-west-needs-to-know/ It is just sick that our government is supporting these fascist.

  20. Hosein says:

    Iranian directors had made an movie replying to “Fitna”. Download “Beyond Fitna” in this link:
    http://www.thepureislam.wordpress.com
    It just tryis to express the truth about Islam.

    I’m waitint to read your coment about it…

  21. abd alaziz says:

    مرحبا
    Very important>arabi message translated please

    إذا أذنتم لي بسؤال أوجهة الى كل مسيحي في العالم من خلاال موقعكم هذا وهو ماذا أيها المسيحيون لو ثبت لكم أن الرجل الموجود في العربية السعودية والمضطهد طوال حياتة وعلى مرأى وعلم ومسمع الكثير من المسيحيين في العالم ماذا لو ثبت أنة هو عيسى إبن مريم فعلآ مقارنة بتجاوز أحد الصحفيين بحق الرسول الكريم محمد صلى اللة علية وسلم علما بأن لة في ألاامة ثمانية واربعون عاما . القصد هومعرفة رد الغالبية من المسيحيين في العالم على هذا السؤال وليس طلب العون إن ثيت أنة عيسى وفي هذة الحالة سيشكركم على بركم وإحسانكم بة علما بأنة لايعرف هويتة حتى الآن ولا يعرف سوى إسمة الاول أما الحكومة السعودية فهي على علم تام بهويتة الحقيقية . شكرا

    المرسل

    عبدالعزيز

    السعودية الرياض\الملز\المسافر للاجنحة المفروشة غرفة 207

    ت\4783135=207\\\موبايل 0544926790

  22. Konservo says:

    Okay, here’s the translation:

    Welcome
    Very important> arabi message translated please

    If I may ask a question to all Christians in the world of your Kll This is why Christians if you proved you that the man who is in Saudi Arabia and the downtrodden throughout his life and the sight and hearing science and a lot of Christians in the world What if it proved Jesus son of Mary, is already beyond compare One of the right of journalists Holy Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him note that places him in the forty-eight years. Homarafh intent overwhelming response from Christians in the world to this question is not asked to help Thiet that Issa In this case, thank you for the Turkmen, Hossam note that Arafat’s identity is not known until now only his first name either the Saudi government is fully aware of the real identity. Thanks

    Addressee

    Abdulaziz

    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia \ Malaz \ traveller of the furnished room suites

    Translated by google: http://www.google.com/translate_t?sl=ar&tl=en

  23. abd alaziz alshrief says:

    بسم اللة الرحمن الرحيم
    السلاام عليكم ورحمة اللة وبركاتة وبعد : نسبة الى الخطاب من 30 فقرة + 10 ممااود قولة المرسل اليكم سابقا بخصوص قضيتي مع القيادة السعودية وهو بعنوان من جرائمهم بواسطة الجن وذكرت بة الطلبات وهي إمكانيات لديهم وثمن تشغيلها المادي والاجرامي وهو الضرر الفردي بكل أنواعة ويصل الى القتل والضرر *والضرر العام وهو إرتكاب الجرائم عالميا ومنة الحوادث التي تحدث في العالم بمختلف أنواعها الجوية والبحرية والبرية وحرائق وأعتيالاات غامضة والكثير منها* وطلبت منكم متابعة مراقبة زمن الحوادث ومكان وأشرت لكم الى توقفها وبدءها عدة مرات والآن ألا تلااحضون توقفها بعد ذاك الكم من الحوادث المختلفة في العالم * في إشارة لكم عن صحة ماورد بخطابي مع العودة إلية والمتابعة مع جزيل شكري علما بأني لازلت اعاني منهم حتى الساعة أكرر شكري والسلاام
    الاسم المتعارف علية عبدالعزيز الشريف
    الرياض \ الملز \ المسافر للاجنحة المفروشة غرفة 207
    ت \ 4783135 = 207
    موبايل = 544926790

  24. Name of God the Merciful
    Damage to you and God’s mercy and blessings and after: the proportion of the speech, paragraph 30 of + 10 Mmaaod saying the sender to you previously about the issues with the Saudi leadership is the title of their crimes by the jinn said the requests which have the potential for physical and eighth operation and criminal damage which all kinds of individual and up to the killing and injury * General and the damage is committing crimes worldwide and from accidents that occur in the world of various kinds of air, sea and land fires and Aotaialaat vague and many of them * and requested follow-up observation of you time and place of accident and I have you to stop and start several times and now only Tlhoudon halted after that amount of separate incidents in the world * In reference to you about the health Concurs with letters of return and follow up with profound thanks to note that I still suffer from it so am I repeat my thanks and Damage
    Name customary Abdulaziz al-Sharif
    Riyadh \ Malaz \ traveller of the 207 suites furnished room
    T. \ 4783135 = 207
    Mobile = 544926790

  25. I must admit, this is the first time I’ve ever seen “السلاام عليكم” translated as “Damage to you”.

    Give me a bit, I’m going to see if I can figure out what on Earth he’s talking about.

  26. Konservo says:

    Thanks, the WindowsLive translator wasn’t very helpful.

  27. He appears to have absolutely atrocious spelling. I could probably manage to decipher it, given enough time, but I’ve already got my hands full with the work I’ve been doing on Thracian.

  28. Konservo says:

    No problem. I think it might be spam anyway.

Leave a Reply

RSS QOTD

  • B.S. Quote of the Day October 9, 2009
    Obama says that he is: deeply humbled by the decision of the Nobel Committee
  • Reality-based Quote of the Day October 9, 2009
    So soon? Too early. He has no contribution so far.
  • Hilarious Quote of the Day! August 22, 2009
    Obama calls for 'honest debate' on health care
  • Quote of the Day! May 17, 2009
    "I doubt if there are agonies, this side of crime or perhaps cancer, more cruel than that of literary and intellectual effort that will not work out to achievement." - Stephen MacKenna
  • Ancient Roman Quote of the Day March 6, 2009
    uae... puto deus fio
  • Quote of the Day February 5, 2009
    Pelosi: “Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs.” more about “Quote of the Day“, posted with vodpod
  • Idiotic Nationalist Quote of The Day January 30, 2009
    In General- None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron and steel used in the project is produced in the United States.
  • Pre-Existentialist Quote Of The Day! January 20, 2009
    I can't be bothered. I can't be bother to ride, the motion is too violent. I can't be bothered to walk, it's too strenuous; I can't be bothered to lie down, for either I'd have to stay lying down and that I can't be bothered with, or I'd have to get up again, and I can't be bothered with that either. In short: I j […]
  • Ancient Quote of The Day! December 14, 2008
    The magnificent man is liberal, but the liberal man is not necessarily magnificent
  • Diddy Quote of The Day November 15, 2008
    I felt like my vote was the vote that put [Obama] into office. It was down to one vote, and that was going to be my vote. And that may not be true, but that's how much power it felt like I had.

RSS WOTD

  • 2nd WOTD: Changeling April 11, 2009
    1: a person of subnormal intelligence 2: a child secretly exchanged for another in infancy
  • WOTD: Idiot April 11, 2009
    c.1300, "person so mentally deficient as to be incapable of ordinary reasoning," from O.Fr. idiote "uneducated or ignorant person," from L. idiota "ordinary person, layman," in L.L. "uneducated or ignorant person,"
  • WOTD: Pseudo-intellectual November 13, 2008
    Pseudointellectual: 1. One who feigns the marks of superior intelligence: their use of advanced vocabulary is out of context or they acquire possessions considered intellectual.
  • WOTD: Dither November 7, 2008
    Dither - 1) an intentionally applied form of noise used to randomize quantization error 2) To be nervously irresolute in acting or doing. (ME: dideren - "To tremble, shiver, quake.")
  • WOTD: Facticity October 27, 2008
    Facticity: "considered one's place, body, past, position, and fundamental relationship to the Other."
  • WOTD: Epeolatry October 13, 2008
    Epeolatry: "the worship of words."
  • WOTD: Ofermód October 9, 2008
    Ofermód - Old English: lit. "over+mood" - "pride" 1. n pride; 2. adj overbearing, insolent
  • WOTD: synanthrope October 6, 2008
    Synanthrope - an organism associated with humans * Synonym, German: Kulturfolger

Pictures

Of Long Division

Of Short Division

Of Division

Eat_Here01

What's this, RALPH!!!

More Photos

Beware ObamaCare

Boycott GM

No Bailouts

Twitter Updates

  • Watching FNC: Mitch McConnell is pretty much in tears... so am I. I still haven't brought myself to tell my GF about this tragedy. 1 week ago
  • Ben Nelson, predictably, sells out. Typical Dem. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_care_overhaul 1 week ago
  • US kids captured in Pak"This is a wake-up call involving our youths-Muslims and Catholics"-MahdiBray Catholics?Really?http://alturl.com/em3u 2 weeks ago
  • I guess the Congressional Black Caucus is racist, they can't stand to see a black man in the oval office. http://alturl.com/ducm 3 weeks ago
  • Obama's "jobs summit" = Unions and not-4-profits giving elem. school career day type presentations hoping to secure tax $$$ from O and Dems 1 month ago

Hit Counter

  • 191,187 hits